<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarin Technologies: Affected by non-systematic factors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investmentmoats.com/stock-market-commentary/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investmentmoats.com/stock-market-commentary/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/</link>
	<description>Investing in the stock market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:17:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentmoats.com/stock-market-commentary/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-36991</link>
		<dc:creator>George Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentmoats.com/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/#comment-36991</guid>
		<description>I have a diamond worth 78.328 carats -  how do u vaule it .
THank you.


Rdgs,
G Sebastian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a diamond worth 78.328 carats &#8211;  how do u vaule it .<br />
THank you.</p>
<p>Rdgs,<br />
G Sebastian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheFinance.sg &#187; Stock Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentmoats.com/stock-market-commentary/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-29182</link>
		<dc:creator>TheFinance.sg &#187; Stock Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 04:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentmoats.com/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/#comment-29182</guid>
		<description>[...] Supply concerns in India [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supply concerns in India [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarin Technologies: Glittering results but unglittering share price &#124; Investment Moats - Stock Market Investing</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentmoats.com/stock-market-commentary/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-29156</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarin Technologies: Glittering results but unglittering share price &#124; Investment Moats - Stock Market Investing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentmoats.com/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/#comment-29156</guid>
		<description>[...] Supply concerns in India [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supply concerns in India [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentmoats.com/stock-market-commentary/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-24930</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentmoats.com/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/#comment-24930</guid>
		<description>Top 5 Myths About Valuations 

MYTH 1 : An insurance valuation can only be done by a registered valuer

WRONG! An insurance valuation is an assessment how much it would cost to replace a particular piece of jewellery in the current marketplace. The significant determinants of value of diamond jewellery are the 4 C&#039;s of the diamond together with retail market pricing information. If all this information is available, a replacement value can be computed. If the diamond is accompanied by an internationally recognised grading certificate, the 4 C&#039;s are known and accurate. All that remains is to price that diamond in the current marketplace. All that is important to your insurance company is that the valuation is detailed and accurate. This will ensure you of like-for-like replacement. 

MYTH 2 : I got a great deal, I was shown a valuation of double the ticket price

WRONG! You should be extremely suspicious of a jeweller who shows you a high valuation as proof that you are getting a great deal. In many circumstances, the jeweller using the valuation to sell you the item is in fact the valuer. If you were buying a house, would you let the seller perform the building inspection for you? A valuation should only be offered AFTER you have completed your purchase. After all, the true insurance replacement value of the piece of jewellery is what you paid for it.

MYTH 3 : A valuation is accurate even if your diamond is not certified

WRONG! A valuation can only be accurate if the characteristics of the diamond have been accurately determined. Although many valuers have vast experience in the industry, the accurate determination of the characteristics of a diamond is a scientific process requiring extremely expensive diagnostic equipment. Only internationally recognised laboratories possess this required equipment. All a valuer can do for an uncertified diamond is make an educated guess of these characteristics. Unfortunately, even slight differences in the valuers grading to an accurate laboratory grading could translate to thousands of dollars in value. 

MYTH 4 : A valuer does not have to be independent

WRONG! Some jewellers use valuations as selling tools. If the jeweller and the valuer are not independent, the valuation may be inflated to enable the jeweller to sell the diamond. The easiest way of inflating a valuation is to overstate the grade of the diamond. This can only occur if the diamond is uncertified. The valuer should have no vested interest in the specific value attributed to your jewellery. 

MYTH 5 : The higher my valuation, the higher my insurance payout

WRONG! You will pay higher insurance premiums, but, in the event of a loss, your insurance company reserves the right to replace the jewellery with a similar piece. The insurance company can and will source the replacement at a cost much lower than you actually paid, regardless of the valuation. The only situation in which you will be paid out is if you have under-valued the item and the insurance company cannot replace it for your insured value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top 5 Myths About Valuations </p>
<p>MYTH 1 : An insurance valuation can only be done by a registered valuer</p>
<p>WRONG! An insurance valuation is an assessment how much it would cost to replace a particular piece of jewellery in the current marketplace. The significant determinants of value of diamond jewellery are the 4 C&#8217;s of the diamond together with retail market pricing information. If all this information is available, a replacement value can be computed. If the diamond is accompanied by an internationally recognised grading certificate, the 4 C&#8217;s are known and accurate. All that remains is to price that diamond in the current marketplace. All that is important to your insurance company is that the valuation is detailed and accurate. This will ensure you of like-for-like replacement. </p>
<p>MYTH 2 : I got a great deal, I was shown a valuation of double the ticket price</p>
<p>WRONG! You should be extremely suspicious of a jeweller who shows you a high valuation as proof that you are getting a great deal. In many circumstances, the jeweller using the valuation to sell you the item is in fact the valuer. If you were buying a house, would you let the seller perform the building inspection for you? A valuation should only be offered AFTER you have completed your purchase. After all, the true insurance replacement value of the piece of jewellery is what you paid for it.</p>
<p>MYTH 3 : A valuation is accurate even if your diamond is not certified</p>
<p>WRONG! A valuation can only be accurate if the characteristics of the diamond have been accurately determined. Although many valuers have vast experience in the industry, the accurate determination of the characteristics of a diamond is a scientific process requiring extremely expensive diagnostic equipment. Only internationally recognised laboratories possess this required equipment. All a valuer can do for an uncertified diamond is make an educated guess of these characteristics. Unfortunately, even slight differences in the valuers grading to an accurate laboratory grading could translate to thousands of dollars in value. </p>
<p>MYTH 4 : A valuer does not have to be independent</p>
<p>WRONG! Some jewellers use valuations as selling tools. If the jeweller and the valuer are not independent, the valuation may be inflated to enable the jeweller to sell the diamond. The easiest way of inflating a valuation is to overstate the grade of the diamond. This can only occur if the diamond is uncertified. The valuer should have no vested interest in the specific value attributed to your jewellery. </p>
<p>MYTH 5 : The higher my valuation, the higher my insurance payout</p>
<p>WRONG! You will pay higher insurance premiums, but, in the event of a loss, your insurance company reserves the right to replace the jewellery with a similar piece. The insurance company can and will source the replacement at a cost much lower than you actually paid, regardless of the valuation. The only situation in which you will be paid out is if you have under-valued the item and the insurance company cannot replace it for your insured value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drizzt</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentmoats.com/stock-market-commentary/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-23913</link>
		<dc:creator>Drizzt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentmoats.com/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/#comment-23913</guid>
		<description>Hi Denish, that seem like a bold statement. May I know how was this reflected to you that the management shows evidence of dishonesty and being unlikeable?

regards,

  Drizzt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Denish, that seem like a bold statement. May I know how was this reflected to you that the management shows evidence of dishonesty and being unlikeable?</p>
<p>regards,</p>
<p>  Drizzt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denish</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentmoats.com/stock-market-commentary/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/comment-page-1/#comment-23878</link>
		<dc:creator>Denish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentmoats.com/value-investing/sarin-technologies-affected-by-non-systematic-factors/#comment-23878</guid>
		<description>It is alack of faith in Sarin Leadership.  The president/CEO and his immediate staff are perceived as dishonest and unlikeable.  Change at least the top 4 managers and improve the stock.  It is that simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is alack of faith in Sarin Leadership.  The president/CEO and his immediate staff are perceived as dishonest and unlikeable.  Change at least the top 4 managers and improve the stock.  It is that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.investmentmoats.com @ 2012-02-11 22:54:06 -->
