I wasn’t born with a silver spoon. In fact, due to a lot of circumstance I stopped taking pocket money from my parents since 16 years old.
For the past 10 years, I worked as an engineer, not drawing more than $5,000 in monthly salary at any point in my career.
In 5 years time, I believe I can reach Financial Independence, where I can afford to take the foot off the pedal and choose how I want to live the second part of my life. Conservatively, I believe I am very near it.
Many have asked how did I build my wealth to enable me to be close to it. I believe many people can do it as well.
I distilled what I did in this post here. In this article you will gain:
- The three fundamentally sound things that lay my wealth building foundation
- Comparison of someone who do more versus someone who did less of these things
- What are the 2 most important factors to build wealth and they just happen to be within your control
- The alternative to build wealth if you are not investment savvy
- The difference in not saving now but saving later and end up doing just as well
- Will you still have enough to spend?
No luck just Smart Actions
Many in this world have come before us that to be wealthy it is not hard.
The way to build wealth is ridiculously simple.
It is not about luck. It is rather scientific.
And because it is scientific, it means being wealthy is within your reach.
When I heard Todd Tressidder explained it , I just thought it represent what we tried so hard to find so well.
The crazy simple formula to be wealthy
Building sustainable wealth for the average folk involves doing three things well:
- Spend Less
- Earn More
- Build Wealth Wisely
That’s it. I just provided the holy grail. Couldn’t get more simple than that.
1. Spend Less
We all started with roughly almost the average amount of privileges. We went through roughly the same education system, and judging by the trend, a large proportion of the people work towards a minimum degree in university.
What usually differentiates people are their spending patterns.
The wise ones
- Spend within their means. If they earn $2,500, they won’t spend $3,500
- What they spend on reflects their values. You will not see them buy the best blenders, television and go for big holidays if their highest value are their kids. You are likely to see them working within what they can spend on and devoting an above average amount compared to other parents on their children
- Are conscious about spending and have a systematic spending plan. Some use budgeting to be in control where they funnel their income and seldom encounter an emergency spending that catches them off guard
- Sell old stuff before buying new. There is a conscious effort to “liquidate” whatever they can, think thoroughly before buying something and ensuring they get a good value for their purchases (value is not cheap, its quality at an acceptable price)
- Will not borrow to pay for things that do not build wealth. Using credit cards or loans to boost spending will mean not knowing what you need to cut in the future to fund purchases that don’t add value
We have an example here of a 25 year old that have 30 years to build wealth. He earns a modest $2,500 a month salary at the start with 2 months of bonus. This adds up to $35,000.
With a tax rate of 20% taken off his gross salary, he ends up with a disposable income of $28,000.
Assuming he is young, and have not set aside any cash for investments and he spends a lot such that he can only funnel 10% of his initial disposable income ($2,800 each year for 30 years) to building wealth.
Throughout the 30 years, he does not increase the amount or percentage that he adds to building wealth and that the wealth fund is only in cash.
He ends up with $84,000 at the end of 30 years.
Now what if instead of spending so much, he decides to spend less, be more frugal?
He would then be able to possibly funnel 50% of his initial disposable income ($14,000 per year for each of 30 years) to building wealth.
Just by that alone, without channelling the wealth fund into higher return assets, he can build up $420,000 in 30 years compare to $84,000 previously.
You may question, even if he is frugal on the onset, wouldn’t his future spending increase?
How would he be able to maintain that?
He would only have $14,000 a year to spend on, which works out to $1166 per month.
However, remember that we are using a conservative 3% salary increment and that, since he has already allocated a high initial wealth funding, his 3% increment can all go to future spending needs.
The column Leftover for Spending Allocation shows a gradual rise such that at age 30 he will have $18,459 to allocate for spending or $1,538 per month.
We will explore more later.
Spending less matters. The less you spend the more you can channel to build wealth, even when you build wealth with low return assets such as cash.
2. Earn More
Optimizing your spending is important, but doing that is working within the constraint of your existing employment situation. It is akin to working based on the size of the existing box.
Why not increase the size of that box?
The internet have made knowledge readily available, and have increase the different ways we can build knowledge and enhance our existing skillset, not to mention learn new skills.
It has also liquidfy the available opportunities that we can find to supplement our income from our main job.
The wise ones
- Make use of company education and training to enhance their core competency. They also developed an interest in their work to develop a valuable skill set. This makes them employable and able to seek opportunities with higher remuneration
- Does not burn bridges and network extensively
- Change jobs when they have learn what they can, when they do not feel challenged or seek up greater challenges or when they are not adequately compensated
- Work overtime to gain extra money (but this is probably at the expense of health)
- Build hobbies and interest areas into a monetary income stream. When you are interested in certain areas, you might be able to build a following and be able to sell goods and services using your expertise to supplement your main job income. E.g. A bike enthusiast who gains contacts on cheaper or not available bike parts and able to bring them in to sell to other local enthusiast
- For some people with unique competency, the internet has liquidfy the environment such that you can take up free lance jobs. This includes, designers, artists through ODESK, Freelancer.com or you could have competent skills that can consult other contacts on the side
- This may overlay previous, but a person can also start a side business with like minded folks or good friends to seed a business that may eventually provide a sizeable income stream
We continue to illustrate with the same guy from (1) .
The only difference here is that while he channels 10% of his initial disposable income to wealth building, he also channel 50% of future disposable income increments (which works out to 1.5% per year) into wealth building to supplement the original 10%.
Compare to the original $84,000, with the increment yearly contribution, after 30 years, the wealth fund grew to $330,000.
But what if, he makes himself more competent and his salary can grow at a rather much more than the conservative estimate. If we smoothed out his various job hopping and promotions and conservatively estimate a growth rate of 5% instead of 3%,
He would have accumulated $594,143 or 80% more than previous.
Here in this table, you can observe the supplementation to the original $2,800.
Each salary growth of 2.5% gets added on to next year, which is added on to the next year so essentially your contribution of wealth funding grows
- Year 1: 2.5%
- Year 2: 5.0%
- Year 3: 7.5%
Wealth Funding as a % of Annual Total grew from a modest 10% of combined income to 40%. That is how wealth funding grows.
Side Jobs / Freelancing
We illustrate the same guy whose salary growth is 3%, and now, he has grown more enterprising, paying more attention to his interest area and was able to create an additional stream from monetizing it.
This may be challenging to model because this stream might only be temporary and may not be long lasting but lets give it a try.
The result at the end of 30 years is rather insignificant, $338,480 versus $330,055 had he not taken it up.
Having this additional stream might harm his time devoted to his job which may be more productive.
On the other hand it might develop to something more than $200 per month. The growth rate might change a lot.
For a person earnings low at the start, you can see he will have more flexibility with greater spending allocation.
Earning more matters. It increases the amount and flexibility you can devote to wealth building and spending.
3. Build Wealth Wisely
If you spend less and earn more, you will have more money to fund your wealth building.
Up till now, we are merely discussing about saving, that is, putting the money channelled to building wealth in low risk basic savings.
Savings are low risk and the returns will correspond to the low risk, which tends to be lower.
A person would need to ensure that the wealth he built up do not lose its purchasing power and keeps up with inflation.
This will enable him to build wealth so that he can adequately meet his retirement spending needs.
There are a few ways to build wealth to generate higher returns. Which way you choose depends on:
- Risk appetite. How much short term losses can a person take that prevents him to sleep at night?
- Acquiring and maintaining a skill to wisely build wealth through that method. This can come from your job, going for courses or scouring the internet for different wealth building methods. E.g. learning the in and outs of purchasing a property and renting it out, understanding the returns, pitfalls, and effort require to be profitable for 30 years
- Active or Passive. How much time do you want to spend on building wealth? Do you want to spend more time with family? Different ways of building wealth comes with different time needed to become competent and also different levels of recurring managing wealth time. (Read building wealth is not as passive as you think)
- Your Edge. Whether you have the ability to confidently build up your wealth consistently over time using your wealth building methods. Some people judge their results on a short 5 year basis as having the edge when they could just be lucky and not competence.
The methods available to build wealth are illustrated above. They are largely classified this way. And different methods comes with their start-up costs, competency required, maintenance of competency & periodic work required.
Without doing enough, failure to grasp behavioural psychology, a person may end up destroying wealth rather than build it.
We go back to the same guy earning the same with a conservative income growth rate.
Everything is the same as the guy illustrated in the example of Earn More, except this time round he puts his wealth fund in a higher yielding asset earning 3%. This could be an insurance endowment or a bond issued from a government linked company.
Compare to no growth, after 30 years, wealth becomes greater.
Suppose he increases his risks and decides to put his money in a low cost passive portfolio, he has the potential to earn a 6% average return. The potential of wealth build looks higher.
If he determines that he has a higher competence in certain areas and takes an active approach to managing wealth, the potential to earn can be closer to 9%. The potential of wealth build is also higher.
Building wealth by taking different approaches can give you higher growth, but the wealth builder have to take a prudent approach otherwise it will result in more detriment then good result.
What matters most
The formula is simple enough. However, there are many variables that decide your success.
What matters the most? What is within your control?
Some time ago, John Rekenthaler, head of Morningstar research wrote a piece called What matters the most.
It’s a good read. You may need to create an account to login.
John highlights a company that profiles an average aspiring retiree:
- 42 years old employee
- Makes $40,000 annual
- Salary grows 3% annually
- No contribution to company investing account but will contribute 6% of income annually to the company account and the company will match it with 50% of the person’s contribution
- The company investment is a passive portfolio with a 0.72% expense and looks to gain 7% per year before this cost
- This person looks to retire at age 67 years old (25 years later)
What course of action will help this person the most to reach his/her goal?
- Start early. Find a time machine to go back and start earlier
- Higher salary. Get a 25% raise to $50,000 a year
- Salary growth. Grow his or her salary at 4% instead of 3%
- Increase wealth funding rate. Instead of funding 6% of the annual income, choose to fund 8%
- Increase company match. The company willingly increase how much it matches the employee’s contribution rate
- Cheaper investment plan. Instead of 0.72% expense, switch to a plan similar but cost 0.22%
- Better return fund. Get a fund that yields 8% instead of 7%
- Retire later. Wait 2 more years to retire, instead of 67.
So among these which are the ones that he or she have a direct control over?
- 1 – Choosing when to start investing
- 4 – Increase funding of wealth building
- 8 – Retire later
- Partially 7 – a Better return fund. A better way to look at it is taking a more active approach
They did a study to determine based on this person’s profile, which would help the person more. The result is below:
The great thing is that the top three are the things that are within the persons control. The surprising thing is that cost (cheaper plan) matters so little, which they attribute to the original plan is relatively not expensive in the first place.
The question here is that there are generally 2 approach to funding wealth:
- Cut Spending, Earn More and funnel a high percentage at the start, then spend a higher percentage of subsequent increment
- Cut Spending , Earn More and funnel a small percentage at the start, then funnel a higher percentage of subsequent increment
The difficulty for most to do (1) is that cost of living might be high and large spending takes place at the start. (2) will be more applicable for them.
(1) Work well for singles.
We have the same situation as always.
We simulate the first case where the person save more of his starting disposable income but allocates very little of his increment to wealth building. Only 0.75% of his 3% annually increment goes to funding it.
After 30 years, he will build up a wealth of $543,027. Not bad for simply putting this into savings.
His spending starts off 50% of his total disposable income but ends closer to 36%. As time progresses he can increase his spending.
Case 2 is simulated with the person funding only 20% instead of 50% for the initial year but funding a greater percentage of his increment (2.25% out of 3%) to building wealth
The amount funded in at the end of 30 years is $537,000 which is close to case (1) $543,000.
The difference is that spending allocation becomes much more manageable. At the end of 30 years you end up funding MORE than case (1).
So does this mean whichever approach doesn’t matter?
Note that the wealth growth rate is set at 0%.
We know the concept of time value of money means that money over a longer period of time compounds and build wealth with less capital required. (Read Rich Man Poor Man)
And because of that case (1) will build more wealth than (2).
In the case of top (case (1)), the wealth build is $76,000 more than bottom (case(2))
It make sense to funnel more to build wealth and let compounding work its magic as early as possible. If not, the returns are not shabby as well. Only if its compounded over a longer period. Only then will you see a bigger difference between the 2
Higher wealth funding (Note this for those that are less investment savvy)
Another determinant of wealth built within our control is how much we choose to fund to build wealth.
To fund more, it means we need to earn more and spend less.
Here is the result of an initial funding of 10% of disposable income ($2800 fixed for 30 years)
Here is the result of an initial funding of 50% of disposable income ($14,000 fixed for 30 years)
There is a lot of focus on getting better Wealth Returns, but in the example above, Vanguard have highlighted that the amount you funnel to wealth building matters more than your wealth returns.
If your savings rate is high, it makes up for not having great returns (10% annual savings increases at 4% wealth returns almost similar to 5% annual savings increases at 8% wealth returns).
The result is very obvious and it shows that if a person were to meet the retirement goals or build greater wealth, he should channel as much as possible to wealth building
A tale of a hard-working person
Having said all, it looks like the formula to put to work is
- Spend less and strive to earn more. He will funnel 40% of his initial disposable income of $3,000 with 2 month’s bonus to building wealth. Subsequently 30% of his annual increment of 3% will go to building wealth.
- Learn to build wealth wisely. He decides to quarterly invest in a passive portfolio of stock and bond exchange traded fund, growing his wealth at 4%.
- Start early. He decides to start building out of university and will have 30 years till age 55 to build wealth.
- Contribute more
He would have funded a total of $580,360 to building wealth and with his investing increase this contribution to $1,011,109.
His monthly gross salary would have increased from $3000 to $7069.
What was a 40% contribution out of disposable income slowly went down to 34%.
He will start of having $1680 per month to spend growing to $4338 per month to spend.
This estimation is carried out for one person. When the person gets married, further expenses can be optimize further and income will be likely supplemented if the spouse is also working.
Will $580,000 be enough for financial freedom? How about $1 mil? That is a topic for another day.
A high income earner who hopes to be Financially Independent by 40
So we hear stories, of people who was able to retire in their 30s and are so envious of their situation.
They must have rich parents or high income earner. How close to the truth is that?
Perhaps some have overestimate what is required to retire, but financially independentis a correct phrase for them.
By that, it means that they have acquired wealth that sufficiently provides for their daily needs that they can take up choices in life that are otherwise not possible.
Some folks have worked hard in school, or managed to get into a profession with a high starting starting pay, would he or she be able to be financially independent at a young age?
In our simulation here, we have the following scenario
- Stay single and choose not to get a dwelling
- Assuming he is privileged to start off with a high salary relatively. He will funnel 80% of his initial disposable income of $5,000 with 2 month’s bonus to building wealth.
- Subsequently 20% of his annual increment of 3% will go to building wealth.
- Learn to build wealth wisely. He decides to quarterly invest in an active portfolio of stock and bond exchange traded fund, growing his wealth at 6%.
- Start early. He decides to start building out of university and will have 15 years till age 40 to build wealth.
At the end of 15 years, he would have accumulate a portfolio wealth of $1.1 mil. Note that an assumption here is that he would have to build wealth rather wisely.
He funded nearly $45,000 of his first year $56,000 salary. At the end of the 15 years, his wealth funding only increase by $5,000 more.
At this point, with a safe withdrawal rate of 3% per year, he would have $32,654 per annum or $2,737 per month, which will be able to take care of the necessities in life.
3% looks conservative, but if you want the amount to conservatively last through a volatile stock market cycle, you would want a lower withdrawal rate.
Young enough to choose how life goes
What this means is that at 40, this guy is young enough to make a profession decision that will more likely satisfy him.
He could have choose to find love then.
He can choose to start a business with the knowledge he has accumulated up till then.
How can anyone live on $11,200 per year?
A common question readers will have is how can anyone survive on such a low amount per year?
This will work out to $933 per month in expenses.
How one decides to live is a matter of where their values and priorities lie.
Different people have different values and a person like that may be sacrificing much (you can’t earn back time), but that is his or her choice.
$933 is a sum that you can work with, you have to optimize your spending.
And at the end of the 15 years his allocation to spending actually increased to $34,000 per annum.
We start off with a conservative profile of an average university graduate starting salary with a conservative wage growth.
To be wealthy is simple. The reality is that you have to
- Stop giving yourself excuses, take action today and find ways to optimize your spending
- Never let go of improving yourself to stay employable, get promoted at work
- If you believe in financial freedom, pick up one of the wealth building methods to grow your wealth further
- Sacrifice things that hold low value to you to funnel more to build wealth
- If you are constraint to not able to fund with a high amount now, commit to use your increment to fund wealth building. I shown that it is a viable route.
- The less mistakes you make, the more wealthy you become
There are no lottery here. No gambling. Luck is but a small factor here.
80% of what is suggested are within your control. It is whether you will do it.
Pick out one area that you need to improve and work on it. Share with me what are the potential problems building wealth this way.
Share this with your friends who you think will benefit from.
Start by using this Wealthy Calculator here (which we use above) to project how much of your income you would like to channel to building wealth today and the wealth build at the end of X years.
After learning the simple way to start building wealth, let me share with you how important it is to make a decision to build wealth >